![]() ![]() Its biggest problem, like you said, is its total lack of editing functions like insert and append, a major handicap. It's a fantastic recorder and surprisingly accurate with Dragon, but you're right about its limitations for dictation. Just wanted to see how well it worked for dictation. Because you already own the Olympus Cadillac, we were wondering why you downgraded to the LS-7?Ĭhange "No" to "Know" w/ KnowBrainer 2022 Just out of curiosity, it would appear that you already own an Olympus DS-5000id which for speech recognition purposes, would be considered superior in functionality, security and recording quality. Because we are in the speech recognition business, we only recommend recorders that feature Olympus 12 to 1 compressed lossless fidelity DS2 algorithms but even what we consider to be a proper digital recorder for speech recognition would likely score no higher than 98% accuracy so unless you need the other functionality, the LS-7 is performing perfectly. Keep in mind that the Olympus LS-7 is a 94 kHz 24-bit Tresmic (3 microphone) recording studio quality recorder which is really not designed for speech recognition and doesn't include basic speech recognition amenities. As long as you don't need to e-mail your sound files as attachments, require cue review, slider control or seamless punch in for editing, this recorder will work fine with NaturallySpeaking. The only problem with WAV files is their sheer size. You are doing everything right, down to making monophonic recordings. ![]() You're already using the recorder correctly for NaturallySpeaking because the Sonority application is converting your 44.1 kHz wav files to 22.5 kHz so that Dragon can handle them. The 3 Olympus LS-7 includes 3 recording formats which are PCM (WAV), MP3 and WMA.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |